« Secure Digital Card Speed Comparison in Treo 700p | Main | Canon PIXMA MP830 All-in-One a Terrific Office Tool »

June 21, 2006

Introducing the GearBits Subnotebook Scale (GSS)

toughbook_cf-w4.jpgI really like subnotebooks (or sub-notebooks or subnotes, as you prefer), yet there are still far fewer to choose from than larger-sized laptops. The June, 2006 issue of Laptop Magazine had a cover story entitled "Featherweight Champs", which compared six notebooks under 4 lbs. They crowned one a "winner," but, as usual, it wasn't clear to me precisely why it won.

So, to help escape the problems inherent with such subjective methods, I'd like to propose a new metric for comparing small notebooks -- the GearBits Subnotebook Scale (or GSS).

The concept is pretty easy: compare some good aspects with some bad aspects and derive a numeric score as a ratio of the good to the bad.

Good Things (numerator):
- Screen resolution (in megapixels)
- Screen size (diag., in inches)
- Optical drive on-board (Yes = 3, No = 1)
- Battery life (actual, with wireless on, in hours)
- Keyboard pitch (horizontal, in millimeters)

Bad Things (denominator):
- Size (square root of width X depth)
- Thickness (average thickness, in in.)
- Weight (in lbs., as configured above)

Calculation Example: Panasonic Toughbook W4 (shown)

(1024x768/1000000) • 12.1 • 3 • 6 • 19   3254.4
-------------------------------------- = ------ = 88.4
        (10.6x8.3)1/2 • 1.4 • 2.8         36.8  

Here is how some of the more popular subnotes compare:

Model
Screen
Res
Screen
Size
Optical
Batt.
Life
K/B
Pitch
Size
Thick
Weight
GSS
Score
Panasonic Toughbook Y4
1400
x 1050
14.1
Yes
(3)
5
19
12.2 x 9.6
1.6
3.4
100.3
Sony VAIO TX750P/B
1366
x 768
11.1
Yes
(3)
4
17
10.7 x 7.7
.98
2.8
95.4
Panasonic Toughbook W4
1024
x 768
12.1
Yes
(3)
6
19
10.6 x 8.3
1.4
2.8
88.4
Fujitsu LifeBook P7120
1280
x 768
10.6
Yes
(3)
5
18
10.3 x 7.8
1.35
3.4
68.4
Toshiba Portege R200
1024
x 768
12.1
No
(1)
5
19
11.2 x 9
.54
2.7
61.8
Dell Latitude X1
1280
x 768
12.1
No
(1)
3.1
18
11.3 x 7.8
.98
2.5
28.9

Sure, the GSS is not comprehensive. For example, it doesn't differentiate a basic internal DVD/CD-RW "combo" drive from a full-blown internal 16X Dual-Layer DVD-R/W -- either would contribute the same to a laptop's GSS score. So, consider the GSS just as a starting point...feel free to customize it as you see fit, depending on your priorities and needs. Here's a pre-made Excel GSS calculator if you want to tweak the GSS for your own use.

I would suggest that for every "must have" feature beyond those listed above (e.g., Bluetooth), add 20 (or less) to the model's GSS score, depending on the feature's value to you. For example, if you deem Bluetooth to be an indispensible feature, give it a bonus of 20 points -- the Fujitsu P7120 above would have a revised score of 96.3 rather than 76.3, making it a top contender for you. Just remember to add similar adjustments to other laptops with the same feature(s). Sum up these add-ons and compare the revised GSS scores.

And while I designed the GSS to rate subnotebooks specifically, there's no reason you couldn't plug in the specs on any laptop. Just remember that it will likely favor smaller, lighter laptops over bigger, heavier ones even if the larger units offer better performance.

So, how does your laptop score?

Update: A couple of friends with Mac laptops emailed me specs (see table below) -- the GSS seems to work regardless of laptop size (or OS ;-), but it does tend to favor smaller notebooks.

Model
Screen
Res
Screen
Size
Optical
Batt.
Life
K/B
Pitch
Size
Thick
Weight
GSS
Score
Apple Powerbook G4
1280
x 854
15.2
Yes
(3)
2.5
19
13.7 x 9.5
1.1
5.6
33.7
Apple MacBook Pro
1680
x 1050
17
Yes
(3)
3.75
19
15.4 x 10.4
1
6.8
74.5

Posted by Craig in Computing

Comments

Interesting. I just bought an X60 thinkpad. Nothing spectacular in this categorie. But I am wondering why you didn't included it in this comparative review. My first laptop and I feel the need for more autonomy and a new mobile phone (with bluetooth obviously).

Tam

Posted by: [tourist].Tam at April 24, 2007 5:24 AM

Post a comment



(will not be shown publicly)


(will be shown publicly)
Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)