« Logitech Cordless 2.4 GHz Presenter | Main | Introducing the GearBits Subnotebook Scale (GSS) »

June 20, 2006

Secure Digital Card Speed Comparison in Treo 700p

In two previous posts - Treo 650 SD Slot is teh Fastar (February, 2005) and SanDisk Extreme III Secure Digital SD Card (March, 2005) - I compared the speeds of four Secure Digital cards in three Palm OS devices.

Well, it's been 16 months and newer devices and higher capacity cards are now out, so I thought I'd run some more comparisons. This time, however, I'll be using the new Palm Treo 700p along with its venerable brothers, the 650 and 600.

The four SD cards being tested here are:

sdcards2.jpg

L to R: Adata 150X 4GB, SanDisk 133X Extreme III 1GB, SanDisk Ultra II 66X, SanDisk 512MB

Here are the results using VFSMark v1.1 (notice that the 4GB Adata card was not tested in the Treo 650 or 600 -- those devices do not come with support for FAT32 file systems required for 4GB cards):

Treo Model:
700p
700p
700p
700p
650
650
650
600
600
600
SD Card
Adata 150X 4GB
SanDisk Extreme III 133X 1GB
SanDisk Ultra II 66X 2GB
SanDisk 512MB
SanDisk Extreme III 133X 1GB
SanDisk Ultra II 66X 2GB
SanDisk 512MB
SanDisk Extreme III 133X 1GB
SanDisk Ultra II 66X 2GB
SanDisk 512MB
File Create
206
433
70
89
369
69
169
257
63
137
File Delete
52
210
42
80
182
42
73
151
39
69
File Write
128
237
77
63
220
76
61
155
16
54
File Read
786
814
814
773
682
682
653
179
173
168
File Seek
2950
2950
2950
2950
786
842
786
421
421
406
DB Export
92
216
41
60
216
44
63
123
35
46
DB Import
98
103
99
101
419
426
412
448
438
419
Record Access
1206
1131
1096
1096
822
754
786
362
338
332
Resource Access
1163
1200
1163
1097
800
752
738
352
333
331
VFSMark
742
810
705
701
499
409
415
272
206
218

I think a few conclusions can be made from these data. First, the SanDisk Extreme III is a very fast card. At a rated speed of 133X, it bested even the 150X Adata card overall.

Second, the added expense of their Ultra II line above and beyond the price of SanDisk's standard (blue) line of SD cards appears to be wasted if used in a Treo. There's just no appreciable bump in speed. Maybe on a PC -- didn't test that here, so can't generalize -- but not on a Treo.

Third, the 700p looks like it has faster access to SD cards than its predecessors, which is good news. Not only can it handle FAT32-formatted cards (up to 4GB), it reads faster than the 650 and 600 and writes much faster than the 600 (but about the same as the 650).

So, if you rely on card-intensive apps, you may want to consider the combination of a Treo 700p and a SanDisk Extreme III as a pricey, but effective, upgrade.

Posted by Craig in Mobile & PDAs and Phones

Comments

A 700p? I'm jealous... :-)

Thanks for updating the testing.

Posted by: Renee at June 20, 2006 12:54 AM

Very weird results for me...on a Treo 650 with FAT32 in custom rom and a standard sandisk 1gb card...formatted to FAT16 on the pc. In my treo I get vfsmark results even faster than the extreme 3 on the 700p! I get 877...

Posted by: Abe Frohman at November 29, 2007 10:29 PM

With a little hardware tweaking and a custom rom, I tested out an 8gb card, I got a vfs mark of 950! Fuck you 700p! My 650 which is only 89 bucks on ebay is still better than your 400 dollar ass!

Posted by: Robert Stever at May 1, 2008 4:51 PM

Post a comment



(will not be shown publicly)


(will be shown publicly)
Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)