Prev: Mozilla 1.7 in Beta | Main | Next: Free Google eMail

April 01, 2004

Concept: The SynthetiDesk

As you can tell from my posts here at GearBits, I spend a fair amount of time thinking about mobile devices. Well, I've also been thinking about the other end of the spectrum.

Most of my day, and much of a lot of people's day, is spent sitting at a desk doing work that is very appropriate to be doing at a desk. Composing longish documents, reviewing and synthesizing multiple sources of information concurrently, etc. Granted, I could do these things with a laptop or even a wireless PDA, but I see their lack of screen real estate as a major hindrance. So, what I've been dreaming about is what I'm calling SynthetiDesk (not because I think that's a particularly jazzy name, but for the simple fact that nobody has yet used this term on the web before).

synthetidesk.jpgPictured is an incredibly crude mock-up of what I'm thinking (please ignore the sad joke that is my Photoshopping). What you see is basically an interactive, touch-sensitive LCD panel with massively high resolution. Roughly 250 dpi would be needed to approximate the legibility of paper. So, a 5 foot by 2.5 foot SynthetiDesk would require a touch-screen LCD with a resolution of [gulp] 15,000 x 7,500 pixels. Sorta makes that 1920x1080 monitor you've been dreaming of seem like dogmeat, eh?

None of the five documents shown in the mock-up are hardcopies -- they are all interactive images, such as you'd see on a PC desktop today. One big difference between this model and, say, a Windows model is that a document doesn't need to be in a program. The documents are viewable just like photographs or print-outs or other hardcopies are. We don't need a viewer program to look at the daily hardcopy newspaper, so SynthetiDesk would ideally not require one either for most everything.

However, if I want to alter a document, then some form of application may be required, but not necessarily. Editing the contents of a text document should be as simple as highlighting (with a finger or stylus or something) and then touching up with the keyboard or voice dictation (assuming that ever actually works).

Documents can be easily manipulated by touching them, such as dragging some papers together to create a pile. With a gesture or voice command, the pile would become iconized or transformed in some other way into something more manageable. The icons in the upper left could be piles of documents, individual documents, shortcuts to web pages (as shown in the browser/web documents).

Another feature of the SynthetiDesk is the ease with which hardcopy documents and objects can be transformed into images. The user would simply place the document (or photo or receipt, etc.) face down, utter a command (or somehow execute an action) to scan the document. The document is then represented in high resolution on the desktop, and the hardcopy can now be recycled (or folded into a paper airplane or whatever). Stacks of documents would still require a sheet-feeder, but that's a trivial extension of the concept.

Of course, using dynamic information (streaming A/V, constantly updated tickers, etc.) on the SynthetiDesk is really easy to do given the active nature of the medium. This would bring new realms to "dragging and dropping" simply because you could now have more documents and objects "open" at any one time than ever before. Instead of squinting to read even just two side-by-side pages on your current monitor, imagine being able to simultaneously compare a few document pages, a handful of photographs, a movie clip, some information tickers, and a couple of webpages. I think a lot of peoples' jobs would be greatly enhanced by something like this -- I know mine would.

One of the advantages of the SynthetiDesk is to let someone work with representations of materials they're familiar with, yet eliminate as much paper as possible. Paper is analog...when it comes to information, analog is much more difficult to deal with. Also, paper is physical...when it comes to storing information, I'd much rather store bits than pages any day of the week.

So, I realize this is unlikely to happen sometime soon, but I do think something like it will happen at some point. One of the goals of a lot of visionaries is to make the PC "disappear" into other things we use and interact with. As one researcher said, "We want people to use computers without even realising they're using them." I think the SynthetiDesk is one such example of how the very furniture we use becomes imbued with computer-like capabilities to create an entirely new, and much more useful, concept.

Posted by Craig | Permalink | TrackBack
Comments

Nice idea...but I'm sure that Kroll or Steelcase or someone has a patent on this already. This reminds me of Vannevar Bush's concept as presented in his very famous essay, "As We May Think" circa 1945 (http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/flashbks/computer/bushf.htm). Here's an excerpt:

"Consider a future device for individual use, which is a sort of mechanized private file and library. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, "memex" will do. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.

It consists of a desk, and while it can presumably be operated from a distance, it is primarily the piece of furniture at which he works. On the top are slanting translucent screens, on which material can be projected for convenient reading. There is a keyboard, and sets of buttons and levers. Otherwise it looks like an ordinary desk."


You should look at what's happening in the flexible display market, too, since your idea would require cost effective materials to mass produce. See E-ink (www.eink.com).

Posted by Eric Swenson at April 1, 2004 03:26 PM
Post a comment
YOU ARE VIEWING AN OLD ARCHIVE

To leave a comment or read updated entries, please visit GearBits' current site. Thanks.