November 16, 2003
Review: 'The Matrix: Revolutions'
After watching The Matrix: Revolutions, the third (and hopefully final) installation of the Matrix trilogy, I found myself trying to choose among three words to describe the movie: tedious, trite, and unsatisfying. Warning: this review contains spoilers (but if you care, you've probably already seen it).
Regarding "tedious," the movie could have easily been 45 minutes long and still contained the same basic plot elements and storyline, and it might have actually been a better movie. The scene with the squids attacking Zion was about 400% too long. Trinity's death speech is about 1000% too long. The scene where Smith is trying to get Neo to guess that he has taken over a human form is just ridiculous -- I expected Smith to next say "It's me, Smith, the program...don't you recognize the voice, you idiot?" And don't get me started on the slow-motion effect (don't you guys have any other buttons on those CGI machines??).
Regarding trite, there were more cliches and predictable one-liners than I could even keep track of. The only two entertaining characters in the whole movie were Agent Smith and the Frenchman -- they had decent dialogue and were sufficiently animated as to actually make you care. In this film, none of the main characters had even as much personality as the machines they were fighting.
Finally, the ending was highly unsatisfying. Suddenly, in the span of about 5 minutes, we go from the end of the world to Paradise. And to add just a slap in the face, the brothers Wachowski made it blatantly obvious that they were leaving the door open for yet another sequel ("who knows, dear, we might see Neo again someday"). Gimme a break.
I was entertained about 30% of the time I was in the theater seat (not counting previews), with the remaining 70% of the time spent alternatively wondering "who wrote this stuff?" and "I wonder if my phone has service." Overall, my rating is a 5 out of 10. The first movie was good, if not great (9.5/10) and the second was somewhat disappointing (7/10), but the third was just a big, fat dud.
I didn't check ratings or reviews much before seeing the movie, but it appears my sentiments aren't mine alone. RottenTomatoes.com's aggregated reviews puts it at a rather lame 34%, and IMDB users rated it a fairly pathetic 6.5 (heck, even Terminator 3 got a 7.0). Here's hoping we've seen the last of Neo and his slow-mo gang.
Posted by Craig | PermalinkHaven't seen the movie yet, but your review had me ROTFL! Shame about the franchise, eh?
Posted by Sam at November 16, 2003 02:12 AMI had already decided to wait until it went to DVD before reading your review and am certain I will now. I'm actually stoked to go see "Master and Commander" instead!
Posted by Mitch at November 16, 2003 09:53 AM"Master and Commander" doesn't entice me too much. Next on my list to see is "Elf" -- you just can't beat Will Ferrell.
The peeps I went to see Matrix with last night and I were pondering the idea of a Hot Shots-style parody of the Matrix series. Imagine Charlie Sheen playing Neo...one parody might be better than the original trilogy! Now...who would play Morpheus...hmmm...
Posted by Craig at November 16, 2003 11:17 AMI got it...Chris Tucker should play Morpheus! Muhahahahaha...
Posted by Craig at November 16, 2003 11:19 AMDuring this movie I was like " Oh, please stop talking and start some fight"... Nightmare... BTW Ms Moss looks like Neos mother...
Posted by lkluj at November 16, 2003 12:29 PMHow about the girl who plays Dharma (Jenna Elfman?) as Trinity?
Posted by Sam at November 16, 2003 12:36 PMLOL...yeah, Jenna Elfman...very much the Anti-Trinity as Chris Tucker would be the Anti-Morpheus. Of course Queen Latifah would play the Oracle (she already did in a different movie).
Posted by Craig at November 16, 2003 12:48 PMI might go see Master and Command. It got a really great NYT review. For Matrix, I will do what I did last time--wait for the DVD rental.
Posted by Ken at November 17, 2003 10:56 AMI find your review of the movie quite interesting Craig. I saw the movie yesterday. I had read the reviews prior to seeing the movie and expected a dud. I was not anticipating a quality story line nor further character development. In actuality I thoroughly enjoyed the movie. It was action packed with great special effects. It just goes to show how expectations reflect the enjoyment of the film.
Posted by Mike at November 17, 2003 09:13 PMInteresting, Mike. So are you saying that if I had expected a bad movie I would have enjoyed it more? Or, are you saying that if I had expected just a one-dimensional yawn-a-thon, I wouldn't have been disappointed as much? I agree with the latter, but since I didn't really expect it to be very good, I wasn't as much disappointed as I was bored.
Posted by Craig at November 17, 2003 09:24 PMTo leave a comment or read updated entries, please visit GearBits' current site. Thanks.